Every claim sourced. Every entity known.
OSINT due diligence without fabricated citations. Every entity. Every claim source-linked. Twenty minutes instead of nine hours.
TUGAVIK
INGESTION
ENTITY RESOLUTION
SOURCE GRADING
INFERENCE
Every claim source-linked
STRAC/NRO parsing
Multilingual coverage
Analyst-ready output
Due diligence at the speed of a filing cabinet.
Research-security analysts and supply-chain managers are drowning in manual entity screening that scales linearly with headcount, not with technology.
45 minutes per entity, fifteen entities deep
An NRC research-security analyst clearing a batch of fifteen grant applications with international partners spends 45 minutes per entity on manual search. That's nine hours of retrieval before a single assessment decision is made. Most entities get skimmed, not screened.
LLMs fabricate citations
Every existing AI shortcut for OSINT research hallucinates sources. A fabricated citation is worse than no citation. The analyst now has to verify everything the AI said plus undo the false confidence the wrong source created. Most teams have tried ChatGPT for this and stopped.
The Named Research Organizations list is parsed by hand
STRAC and the NRO list are PDF documents that change periodically. Analysts manually cross-reference entity names against these lists. There is no API, no automated matching, no alert when the list updates. If you miss a match, you clear an entity you shouldn't have.
Source quality is invisible
A Russian-language news outlet that is a known state propaganda channel and a peer-reviewed journal article carry equal weight in a manual search. No existing tool grades sources by credibility. The analyst's gut is the only filter, and gut doesn't scale.
Publication and co-author networks are unexplored
An entity's research relationships (co-authorships, institutional affiliations, funding sources, conference connections) form a graph that reveals more than any single data point. No analyst has time to build that graph manually. The most important signals sit in the connections no one mapped.
No audit trail for clearance decisions
When a regulator asks why a specific entity was cleared, the analyst's answer is "I searched Google and didn't find anything concerning." There is no structured record of what was searched, what was found, what was assessed, and why the decision was made. That's a liability, not a process.
TUGAVIK replaces the filing cabinet with verified intelligence.
Every manual step your analysts are doing today, searching, cross-referencing, grading sources, filling forms, they're all replaced by a structured AI pipeline where every output is traceable, every claim is sourced, and every decision is defensible.
Drop the entity list. Get fifteen source-graded one-page briefs back in twenty minutes. Every claim linked to a live URL. The analyst's day shifts from data-gathering to decision-making, the work that actually requires human judgment.
TUGAVIK is built around one architectural constraint: no claim enters the brief unless it traces to a live, verifiable source URL. The system does not guess, does not infer unsourced claims, and does not present unverifiable assertions. If it can't source it, it doesn't say it.
The Named Research Organizations list and STRAC data are ingested, structured, and matched automatically. When the list updates, every previous clearance is re-screened against the delta. No manual PDF cross-referencing. No missed matches.
Propaganda outlets, paper-mill publications, grey-zone media, and state-affiliated channels are identified and graded before their content touches the analyst's output. The brief shows the grade alongside the claim, the analyst sees which signals are strong and which are noise.
TUGAVIK maps the co-author network, institutional relationships, funding sources, and conference connections for every named researcher and institution. The graph surfaces indirect relationships that manual search would never reach, the three-hop connection that changes the risk assessment entirely.
Every brief is a permanent record: what was searched, what was found, how sources were graded, what was assessed, and what the output was. When a regulator asks why an entity was cleared, the answer is a structured document with live source links, not a memory.
Let us help you help our sovereignty
TUGAVIK is configured to your specific screening workflows whether that's research-security due diligence, supplier counterparty analysis, or FOCI assessment at scale. Tell us what you're vetting and at what volume. We'll run your actual entities and show you the difference between a source-graded brief and what your analysts are producing today.
